In the world of rugby league, the strategic deployment of fullbacks is a fascinating aspect that often goes unnoticed by casual fans. The NRL, known for its tactical intricacies, has seen a notable trend in recent years where teams are increasingly restricting their fullbacks to one side of the field in attack. This phenomenon raises intriguing questions about the balance between offensive freedom and defensive strategy. In my opinion, this trend is particularly interesting because it highlights the delicate dance between creativity and control in the sport.
One of the most striking examples of this strategy is the case of the Canberra Raiders and their fullback, Kaeo Weekes. In the 2026 season, Weekes has been predominantly utilized on the left side of the field, with only 7.2% of his attacking receipts coming on the right. This is a significant shift from the previous season, where he was parked on the right, and it raises the question: why the change?
The answer lies in the Raiders' overall strategy. In 2025, Jamal Fogarty controlled the right side, while Ethan Strange held down the left edge. By limiting Weekes to the left, the Raiders created a dynamic where his ability to carve up defenses would be more valuable as a foil for Strange. This is a classic example of how a team can use a player's strengths to balance the field and create a more cohesive attack.
However, this strategy is not unique to the Raiders. The Penrith Panthers, under the guidance of coach Ivan Cleary, also employ a similar approach. Dylan Edwards is predominantly used on the right, while Blaize Talagi takes the left. This is not a coincidence, as Cleary's teams have consistently favored a right-side-heavy approach, with Jarome Luai in Talagi's role prior to 2025.
What makes this trend even more fascinating is the impact it has on the overall game. By limiting the fullback's movement, teams are essentially creating a more predictable pattern of play. This can be both a strength and a weakness, as it allows for better defensive preparation but also reduces the element of surprise in attack. In my view, this trend is a testament to the strategic depth of the NRL, where every decision has implications for the entire game.
Furthermore, the numbers support this trend. Since 2020, there has been a noticeable shift towards teams using their fullbacks more on the right side. The absolute percentage point difference between left and right side share of receipts has grown from 7.9% to 21% in 2026. This season, 60.5% of fullback touches within 40 metres of the tryline are on the right side, with just 39.5% on the left side. This data-driven insight provides a compelling argument for the effectiveness of this strategy.
However, it's essential to note that this trend is not without its exceptions. Players like James Tedesco and Will Kennedy have managed to maintain an even split between left and right touches, showcasing the versatility and adaptability of top-tier fullbacks. Additionally, teams like the Roosters, Dragons, and Sharks have managed to maintain a more balanced approach, with an even split of touches on both sides of the field.
In conclusion, the trend of restricting fullbacks to one side of the field in attack is a fascinating development in the NRL. It highlights the strategic depth of the sport and the delicate balance between offensive freedom and defensive strategy. While it may not be a universally adopted approach, its impact on the game is undeniable. As a fan, I find this trend particularly intriguing, as it adds a new layer of complexity to the sport I love. Perhaps, in the future, we will see more teams embracing this strategy, creating a new era of tactical innovation in rugby league.
